Last time I checked it was my understanding that the right to seize property from citizens via eminent domain required that the end result be for public use. For example, a new public highway, a new public park, etc…
Well, it seems that the city of New London, CT has decided to use eminent domain to condem several historical houses and buildings. And what for you ask? Why luxury hotels, condominiums and office space of course. Yeah, that sounds like its for public use! And this benefits tax payers how?
Sorry New London, CT, this is just plain wrong. Worse yet, it smacks of evil. Why don’t you tear down city hall instead of peoples homes. This is a clear abuse of eminent domian.
For the record, here is what the 5th Ammendment says:
“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.“
There does not appear to be anything in that statement that implies it is ok to seize private property for the use of private industry.
